| | | | | | |
 

 
Clonal Propagation :: Sugarcane
   
 

Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. 16(1): 25-29, 2006 (June)

COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON FIELD PERFORMANCE OF MICROPROPAGATED AND CONVENTIONALLY PROPAGATED SUGARCANE PLANTS

Table 1 gives the summarized observations o the agronomic parameters studied in one year tissue cultured sugarcane grown in Patiala, Fatehgarh Sahib district of Punjab and the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal, Haryana. The statical analysis elucidates significance of difference between various characters in the five planting regions. A perusal of Table 1 shows that of offsets raised sugarcanes. Tissue cultured plants attained heights of 240 cm at Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal, 206.75 cm at Mirpur and 206.25 cm at Fatehgarh division Bhari, values that were significantly higher than offsets raised plants (185.6 cm). However, tissue cultured plants at Dhuri attained only a height of 167.5 cm because the crop was not properly irrigated by the growers.

Table 1. Observations taken on random clumps of one year old micropropagated sugarcane variety CoJ 64 grown at different locations in the Punjab and the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Haryana.

Location

Height (cm)

Periphery of cane (cm)

No. of
nodes

No. of canes/
clumps

International
distance (cm)

Yeild (qt/plot)

Sugar recovery (%)

Baran
(Punjab)

191.15

7.58

16.2

14.4

12.3

60.5

9.14

Mirpur (Fatehgarh sahib)

206.75

6.4

14.5

22.0

12.5

64.3

9.75

Fatehgarh div. Barhi (Fatehgarh Sahib)

206.25

8.12

16.8

15.7

9.8

63.6

9.34

Dhuri (Patiala)

167.5

7.8

11.7

11.3

11.8

57.7

8.7

Control (Raised from offsets)

185.6

7.9

15.0

12.8

10.3

56.8

8.25

Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal

240.0

12.2

30.0

7.0

9.1

62.6

9.46

CD (%)

0.524

0.157

0.736

0.964

0.3765

0.3765

0.1982

CV

8.507

8.954

13.347

27.05

10.591

12.423

7.467

The individual value in the Table 1 represent means of five canes or clumps.

The periphery of the tissue cultured plants was smaller than that of offsets raised sugarcane plants except in the sugarcane plants at Fatehgarh division Bahir and the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal where plants had maximum periphery (12.2 cm). Height tillering might have resulted in thinner canes because thickness of the canes is directly proportional to the number of tillers per clump and is also related to the cytokinin effect. Moreover, it is a recognized fact that tissue cultured plants in the first year in thinner and thickness increases in ratoon and subsequent generations.

The tissue cultured plants possessed a higher number of nodes with a higher internode distance. Barring Dhuri plantation where the number of nodes where significantly lower than offsets raised plantation (15), the rest of the plantation at all sites showed a higher number of nodes. Internodal distance at fatehgarh was 9.8 cm and at the sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal it was 9.1 cm and was lower (10.3 cm) than offset type plantations whereas plantations at other locations showed higher internodal distance (Table 1).

In general, because of the thinner dia of canes tissue cultured plantation contained a greater number of canes clump. Number of canes was highest, i.e. 22 in Mirpur plantation followed by 15.7 canes per clump at Fatehgarh whereas offsets raised plantation had a average of 12.8 canes per clump; at the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal the number was 7 canes per clump. Sreenivasan and Sreenivasan (1992) reported that smaller diameter is more than compensated by large increament in millable cane population, which resulted in an increase of tonnage. They further reported significant variation in cane number per clumps in untreated and tissue cultured canes. Furthermore, tillering to the extent of 18 tillers per plantlets was noted by Hendre et al. (1983) in meristem cultured cp 740 plantations. The yield of tissue cultured plants was in general higher than conventionally propagated plants. They yield of tissue cultured plants were in general higher than conventionally propagated plants. The yield as a against 56.8 qt/plot in control the yield was 64.3 qt/plot in tissue cultured derived materials at Mirpur followed by 63.6 qt/plot at Barhi division and 62.2 qt/plot at the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal. This could be attributed to a greater number of canes per clump in issue cultured plants. The sugar recovery percentage also showed higher values for micropropagated plants than the control. The maximum sugar recovery in vitro propagated plants at Mirpur was 9.75% followed by 9.45% at the Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal and 9.34% at Barhi division. On the other hand, Sugar recovery was only 8.52% in the contril. Kilaru and Aruna (1998) reported higher rate of sugar recovery in micropropagated plants as compared to control.

Adoptation of tissue culture methods drought about substantial improvement in that material was free from disease and grew vigorously contributing to a greater productivity.

Micropropagation ensures tree to type and rapid multiplication of disease free material and as such can be used as super elite seed stock for quick spread of new varieties and rejuvenation of old ones of sugarcane. First year planted canes are used for cane seed program and for higher tonnages as they give more tillers per clump.

References:

Dhaliwal RK, Malik CP, Gosal SS and Dhaliwal LS (1997a) Studies on hardening of micropropagated sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets. I. Root and shoot parameters. Ann. Bio. 13(1): 21-25.

Dhaliwal RK, Malik CP, Gosal SS and Dhaliwal LS (1997b) Studies on hardening of micropropagated sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets. II. Leaf parameters and biochemical estimation. ANN. Bio. 13(1): 15-20.

Gosal SS, Thind KS and Dhaliwal HS (1998) Micropropagation of sugarcane – An efficient protocol for commercial plant production. Crop Improv. 25: 1-5.

Hendre RR, Iver RS and Kotwal M (1983) Rapid multiplication of sugarcane by tissue culture. Sugarcane 1: 5-8.

Kilaru and Aruna (1998) Micropropagation of sugarcane – A commercial approach. Proc. 60th Annual Convention of Sugarcane Technologists Association of India. pp. 81-86.

Sreenivasan TS and Sreenivasan J (1992) Micropropagation of sugarcane varieties for increasing cane yield. SISSTA Sugar. J.18(4): 61-64.

 
Special Technologies